Take a look at this- it’s crazy game between two Polish romantics. Kopiecki beat me three times last year- in one of those games I had the White pieces and in the same line after 6…d6 I played something pretty irrational, cursing myself for not castling, so this time I just castled and didn’t really remember what the book tells me to do later. Very soon after I couldn’t believe my eyes when I saw 9…Na5 because it just couldn’t be good, and this guy always out-prepared me before. I’m not sure if giving up an exchange is the right decision for him, but he likes to play with initiative, so this was giving him some chances to be active. And active he was, too much. I like my position after I get all my pieces out with 17.Nbd2, but soon after I don’t like it as much after 23…Bc6- when playing 22 .a4 on the previous move I overlooked this simple, yet annoying , threat. But seems like I was able to hold this together. I liked that I was able to get my rook to the 7th rank and play a5. He was running low on time, I think my moves were giving him problems. But probably there are a lot of tactics missed by both of us- very sharp game with an open board and rooks and bishops cutting through it. Let me know what you think.