Category: Sicilian Defense

Accelerated Dragon with 7…Ng4

I recently attended a lecture by IM Ilye Figler on the accelerated dragon, which inspired me to purchase a few books on the subject. It’s a much more positional opening than it’s fire breathing counter-part, and in general seems safer, more solid, and less risky. So basically, it’s nothing like the main line dragon even though the middle games can sometimes appear very similar, the main difference being black’s refusal to commit his d pawn early, perhaps hoping to play d5 in one go. In the past, I had usually played the maroczy bind against it with white, as this seemed the most straightforward approach. Most of the lecture I attended though focused more on the far more interesting mainlines, where white plays 7.Bc4 instead of the Maroczy, which contain a lot of cute traps. The lecture convinced me that the accelerated dragon may be a good fit for me, but before I decided to play it myself I needed some ideas against the bind in order to be confident. Here is my favorite idea of the several I have come across. It’s a set up that was first introduced by Larsen in the very popular 7…Ng4 variation, or “the exchange variation.” The ideas sketched out in the notation to the following game give the basic concepts for the setup.


Kamsky-Topalov: Game 1

Wow! So, today was the first game of the 2011 World Championship Candidates Matches being held in Kazan. All four games were draws, though two were exciting games to watch. Naturally, as an American, I’m cheering for my fellow Brooklynite Gata Kamsky. This morning at 7am New York time when I was frying and egg and making coffee I was shocked by the first few moves of their game. In a standard Sicilian Najdorf, Kamsky played 6.a4!? and then followed it up with 7.a5! GM Danielsen describes some of the ideas behind this wacky sideline over at Chessdom. Kamsky was just coming off from his win at the U.S. Championship and was in full form for this battle with Topalov. Topalov won a match a couple of years ago against Kamsky as you may recall, but since then Kamsky seems to have gotten sharper while perhaps Topa has fallen off his game a bit- so this match could easily go either way. I can’t wait for 7a.m. tomorrow morning when the battle resumes and Topa will have white.

Here is the first game in its entirety. Kamsky missed a couple of wins as outlined by GM Danielsen over at Chessdom, though the most surprising one to me was when Kamsky played 17.b3, when 17.Bb3 gives white a chokehold on the position, as it threatens Ba4 and thus allows white the push the black queen around and place his pieces actively on the queenside of the board.

Endgame Blunders…

This week I played a game for my team in the NYCCL, where my captain told me I only needed to draw for our team to walk with a positive result. I had the black pieces and had been told that my opponent likes to play 1.d4 and the trompowsky in particular- so I was a little surprised but not disappointed when he played 1.e4. I responded with a Sicilian, and the game was a bit strange for the first few moves but began to look more mainstream by move ten. I made an early middle game blunder in a position where I should have simply won a pawn, and lost the exchange- the rest is my fighting for dear life to draw- and miraculously managing to do so. However, it pains me to admit that I missed about half a dozen winning chances, one of which is quite egregious.

My teammate made me feel a little better by reminding me that it’s sometimes easier to see things when you’re not in the heat of battle, any case here is the game which I’m not terrible proud of but am posting because the last 25 moves or so is rife with instructive error.

A Counter-Punch Sveshnikov Line

As a sveshnikov player I value piece activity over everything else- structure, material, pish posh- give me an attack. The following game follows a not too uncommon line in the Sveshnikov, where on move 12 black really lays down the gauntlet with a gambit. In theory, white should be ok but the traps that lay in wait are far from obvious.

1.Nc3, The Van Geet Attack

Recently, I came across of the newly translated Manual by Harald Keilhack on 1.Nc3 titled “Knight on the Left,” which is well reviewed here. I’ve been inspired by Asa Hoffmann to look more deeply into this terribly neglected first move, and my readers will likely remember my recent post on this line against the caro-kann. It’s odd that it isn’t played more often, considering it is not only sound but also in line with classical opening principals. By developing a knight, white hits central squares, places a knight on a good square, and leaves options open as to the direction the game may take. And yet, if you look for top players who play this, there really aren’t any. Morozevich has tried it on for size, though this shouldn’t surprise anyone, and the Danish Correspondence GM Ove Ekebjaerg played 1.Nc3 exclusively, nearly becoming the Correspondence world champion with this move. And yet, there is a paucity of material on it.

Continue reading »

A Surprising Sortie in a Sveshnikov Sideline…

This Sunday while most people were focused on the Super Bowl, I was at the Marshall Chess Club looking at a different kind of sideline, 7.Nd5 against the Sveshnikov. There are some sidelines that are very popular against the Svesh that I see on FICS all the time, but among them the simplifying 7.Nd5 is without a doubt the most popular. It’s probably the choice of many club players because it side steps the ocean of theory and gives white a simple straightforward game. In blitz it just leaves white with basically nothing to worry about, however, this can also be said for black. Sidelines that are chosen for their simplicity are rarely testing either. In any case, after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Nbd5 d6 7.Nd5 the following position is reached.

Continue reading »

An Antidote for Sideline Sicilians

As a Sicilian player, there are a number of sidelines I hate to see. 2.c3 doesn’t really bother me, since I play that myself and know the system well, but when white plays 2.Nc3, concealing his intentions and waiting for me to commit, I sometimes find myself playing a position I’m not terribly pleased with, particularly if white then goes in for a grand prix attack. Generally, I play the Sveshnikov, which means I have to be prepared for a Rossolimo as well, but for some reason the grand prix attack bothers me while the Rossolimo hasn’t posed me any issues. I know the ideas behind the grand prix, I sometimes play it myself, but that wall of pawns is menacing and if I’ve already committed myself to certain piece placements then my dark squares become weak and I feel like a sitting duck to obvious attacking plans. Well… I will never suffer such passivity again. 2…a6! is the answer! This bit of wisdom was imparted to me by Asa Hoffman recently, and in the few blitz sessions I have played recently I can tell you that it has helped me get over the grand prix hurdle. It basically invites white to play a Closed Sicilian, when black is able to get rapid expansion on the queen-side with a nice solid position with moves like: b5, e6, Ne7, and then break with d5 and you’re equal.

This idea of a useful but non-committal waiting move is so obvious I can’t believe I didn’t think of it myself. Naturally, if white wishes to play an open sicilian you may chose to go into a Kan or Taimanov. These two games illustrate the basic ideas, but any Sicilian player probably sees my point from the above text alone. 2.Nc3 has been recommended by a number of publications recently, and I can tell you that several of my friends play it exclusively when approaching the Sicilian with white.

Notable Game Contest Winner

As I announced last week, I’m giving away a new hardbound copy of Frank Brady’s “Endgame” to the person who submitted the most interesting game to the blog. Congrats to Frank Fortune, to whom I will be sending a copy of the book for this fantastic game with his annotations. I really like the move 13.Nf5, as well as the sac on g7 that precipitates white’s attack. I think the game is both creative and instructive, and I hope our readers get as much pleasure from looking it over as I did.

Thanks to everyone who submitted games and if your game wasn’t selected don’t be discouraged, I’m planning on having a few more of these in the future.

Naka Loses to Carlsen, Shares Lead with Anand

After a disappointing loss to Magnus today, Nakamura still shares first play with Anand, who he will face next. There is no question that the second half of Tata will be more difficult for Nakamura than the first half was, but it isn’t so easy to discount his stellar performance. The game between Nakamura and Carlsen today was a Sicilian Najdorf, where Nakamura went wrong with 25…Qa5, when white has a crushing attack which was fantastically executed by Carlsen. While I was watching the game I had an engine running that suggested 26. Nxe6 as winning, however, Carlsen’s move Rdf1 is actually even stronger.

I have to admit, despite the fact that he is arrogant and there are many reasons to dislike him personally, I am cheering for Nakamura in this tournament. He is after all America’s best shot at having an elite player with a future who may hang around in the top ten for a while. Not to discount Kamsky, who I greatly admire and will be cheering for in his appearance at Candidates, but Nakamura lately has been outperforming him considerably.

Today In Italy-Chucky wins, all other games drawn

Today at the 53rd Reggio Emilia, Ivanchuk picked up a point from Godena in a Ruy Lopez. The move 31.f4 must be a blunder, though white’s position was already under a lot of pressure. It’s good to see Ivanchuk back in form again. This afternoon as the games unfolded however, I was following the Vallejo-Pons – Morozevich game much more closely. It began as a Najdorf, poisoned pawn, but the tension quickly released with a series of exchanges culminating in a quick draw after only 26 moves. Vallejo-Pons still leads the tournament comfortably, but Moro can still catch him.

Continue reading »

Nigel Short Leads in Reggio Emilia

Nigel Short is off to a fantastic start in Reggio Emilia, winning his first two games against Gashimov and Morozevich. A surprising debut, considering his less than stellar performance in London earlier this month. In London, Nigel played very interesting sidelines, deviating from book as early as possible to avoid any theoretical battles with the world’s elite. This was not entirely the case in Reggio Emilia. In his first game with Gashimov, Nigel played the white side of the Sicilian Najdorf, English attack with 6.Be3, however after 6…e5 retreated his knight to the modest post on f3 and then castled kingside. This classical setup is not as daring as going queenside and trying to light up black’s king with a pawn storm. However, while modest, it’s also solid, and tempted Gashimov into a potentially reckless sacrifice.

Continue reading »

Ian Nepomniachtchi wins Russian title by drawing an Armageddon game, in bishop vs rook endgame

Today Ian Nepomniachtchi (2722), a 20 year old GM from Bryansk Russia, won the Russian Championship in a high pressure Sicilian Najdorf against Sergei Karjakin (2760) with Amageddon rules (6 minutes for White vs 5 for Black who had draw odds).  Karjakin missed the game winning move 18. Rg1 and ended up going into a drawing endgame up the exchange.  As soon as the pawns were off the board, Nepomniachtchi displaying perfect endgame technique constructed a fortress by marching his king to h1 (light square) and used his dark square bishop to defend against mate.  With only 25 seconds left on the clock, the gentleman shook hands and Russia’s next champion was crowned.  Video and pgn after the jump.

Continue reading »

Losing to a Legend: an interesting c3 Sicilian

This evening at the Marshall Chess Club, I had the pleasure of playing chess with IM Renato Naranja, former Champion of The Philippines, Pan-Asian Champion, World Championship candidate, 10 time Chess Olympian, and who drew Bobby Fischer in Palma de Mallorca.

For a while, he chatted with me amiably while I studied games from John Watson’s “Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy.” Playing through variations and discussing ideas, he illuminated concepts I would not have otherwise noticed, much less grasped. Many strong players refuse to play friendly games of chess, demanding money for their valuable time. This was not the case with Renato. He was as genial as he was genius, basically giving me a friendly chess lesson in exchange for nothing more than pleasant conversation.

Continue reading »

An interesting idea in the Alapin Sicilian: Releasing the Tension with dxc5

There is an idea which I think is a wonderful bit of knowledge to have for the c3 player. It is advocated by both Rosentalis and Hartley in their tome on the c3 sicilian, as well as Sveshnikov in his recently released manual on the c3 Sicilian. It has been my experience that of the two most common replies to 2.c3, 2…Nf6 and 2…d5, the latter is by far the most common. The idea involves offering an early exchange of queens with dxc5. One line which I have seen in practice is 1.e4 c5 2.c3 d5 3.exd5 Qxd5 4.d4 Nf6 5.Nf3 Bg4 and now 6.cxd5!? giving us the following position.

Here, if black accepts the exchange of queens, then he seemingly enters an ending down a pawn. However, this ending is actually the most testing, since after Qxc5, white will win tempo off the queen to develop rapidly and bring pressure to black’s queenside immediately. One miniature, which I played in a tournament recently, followed this pattern to a quick conclusion.

Continue reading »

Aaggard’s Attacking Manuel Wins BCF Book of the Year Award

I have been meaning to give a favorable review of this book for a while now, and so after the announcement of the BCF award I thought I would give a brief overview of why I think this book is worth owning.

The book begins with a brief discussion concerning the riff over John Watson’s notion of “rule independence,” a debate I am not about to rehash here. Simply put: Aagaard sides with the Europeans in their criticism of Watson’s concept. This brief introductory jaunt into the theoretical debate over rule independence is not entirely inapposite here, as Aagard sets out to articulate new rules in a post-dynamic era. The “rules” he gives are in bold, and appear throughout the book. One such example: When you have the momentum you must act with great speed or the momentum will perish. Another one which I quite liked: We only need to win on one square to deliver mate. Most of these “rules” are vague enough to be applicable in many circumstances, like an astrology reading, however, with each concept he articulates Aagaard follows with a concrete example, giving the reader a firm hook to hang his otherwise abstract hat upon.

Continue reading »